Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • SUNSET SUNSET
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 42
    • Issues 42
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Terraform modules
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Earth SciencesEarth Sciences
  • SUNSETSUNSET
  • Issues
  • #38
Closed
Open
Issue created Sep 20, 2022 by vagudets@vagudetsMaintainer

Negative values in accumulated variables (e.g. prlr, rsds)

Hi @lpalma

As we discussed yesterday in the dev meeting, I have added a filter after loading the data to replace negative values in accumulated variables with 0.

After doing this I also realized that for precipitation, if units are left in mm/s, the calibration step will set all values to zero. This has also been reported here: external/cstools#85 (comment 161986)

My question is, what's the best approach to handle this? Should I convert precipitation to mm/day before calibrating, and then convert it to mm/s again after the calibration is done? Or do you have a different suggestion?

Thank you,

Victòria

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking