This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
working_groups:cp:collection_of_publications [2021/12/16 10:35] ameier |
working_groups:cp:collection_of_publications [2021/12/22 11:49] ameier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ==== Collection of Publications ==== | + | ==== Collection of Publications |
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Here is a quick and dirty hack to access non-open-access articles in case they are included in the journals that the UPC has subscriptions for and supposing that you have UPC credentials. This method is particularly useful for DOI searches (That the UPC Library tries to keep a secret it seemed to me...): | Here is a quick and dirty hack to access non-open-access articles in case they are included in the journals that the UPC has subscriptions for and supposing that you have UPC credentials. This method is particularly useful for DOI searches (That the UPC Library tries to keep a secret it seemed to me...): | ||
- | [[https:// | + | 1) Visit: |
- | Then grab the tail of your DOI html address like " | + | 2) Then grab the DOI of interest as in this example |
- | | + | If that fails, then try this hack [[.collection_of_publications:ups_doi_access_hack| UPC DOI access hack]] |
- | or directly from (restrictive) publisher site like this one | + | |
- | https:// | + | |
- | and paste it in the DOI search field and hit enter. | + | |
- | If you are lucky your publication may be found and accessed that way as in this example.... | + | |
+ | == Tables of Literature potentially useful to our work... == | ||
+ | Feel free to create more sub-pages as you see fit. | ||
+ | Please insert any additions alphabetically by sir name of the first author. | ||
- | https:// | + | [[.collection_of_publications:carbon_cycle |
- | == Table of Literature potentially useful to our work... == | + | [[.collection_of_publications: |
+ | |||
+ | [[.collection_of_publications: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[.collection_of_publications: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[.collection_of_publications: | ||
^ Author | ^ Author | ||
- | ||| | + | | Suzanne E. Cotillon |
+ | | 2017 | The data shows snapshots of 1975, 2000 and 2013 at typically 2km resolution, is based on Landsat imagery and validated with aerial photography, | ||
+ | | | https:// | ||
+ | | | {{ : | ||
+ | | Livia C.P. Dias | Patterns of land use, extensification, | ||
+ | | 2016 | Periods 1940-2000 and 2000-2012: Based on Hansen' | ||
+ | | | https:// | ||
+ | | | {{ : | ||
+ | | Yaqian He, E.L.Timothy & A. Warner | A time series of annual land use and land cover maps of China from 1982 to 2013 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data | | ||
+ | | 2017 | 1982-2013: A 32-year annual land use and land cover (LULC) maps of China were generated. The LULC map created for 2012 has no significant differences from the corresponding MODIS map (available since 2001). The LULC classification methods can be applied to other geographical regions. | | ||
+ | | | https:// | ||
+ | | | {{ : | ||
+ | | Pete Smith | Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? | ||
+ | | 2019 | | | ||
+ | | | https:// | ||
+ | | | {{ : | ||
| Philip Vergragt et al | Comparison of forest above-ground biomass from dynamic global vegetation models with spatially explicit remotely sensed observation-based estimates | | | Philip Vergragt et al | Comparison of forest above-ground biomass from dynamic global vegetation models with spatially explicit remotely sensed observation-based estimates | | ||
- | | 2011 | This paper investigates if and how carbon capture and storage (CCS) could help to avoid reinforcing fossil fuel lock-in. The outcome is that a large-scale BECCS development could be feasible under certain conditions, thus largely avoiding the risk of reinforced fossil fuel lock-in. //Keywords: Carbon capture and storage, Biomass, Fossil fuel// | | + | | 2011 | This paper investigates if and how carbon capture and storage (CCS) could help to avoid reinforcing fossil fuel lock-in. The outcome is that a large-scale BECCS development could be feasible under certain conditions, thus largely avoiding the risk of reinforced fossil fuel lock-in. //Keywords: Carbon capture and storage, Biomass, Fossil fuel// | |
| | https:// | | | https:// | ||
- | | |{{ : | + | | | {{ : |
+ | | Yidi XU et al. | Annual 30-m land use/land cover maps of China for 1980–2015 from the integration of AVHRR, MODIS and Landsat data using the BFAST algorithm | | ||
+ | | 2020 | Annual land use land cover (LULC) change information at 30m spatial resolution covering 1980 to 2015. The data integrates MODIS and Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)) with high spatial resolution datasets (China’s Land-Use/ | ||
+ | | | https:// | ||
+ | | | {{ : | ||
| Hui Yang | Comparison of forest above-ground biomass from dynamic global vegetation models with spatially explicit remotely sensed observation-based estimates | | | Hui Yang | Comparison of forest above-ground biomass from dynamic global vegetation models with spatially explicit remotely sensed observation-based estimates | | ||
| 2020 | Uses the GlobBiomass data set of forest above-ground biomass (AGB) density for the year 2010, obtained from multiple remote sensing and in situ observations at 100 m spatial resolution to evaluate AGB estimated by nine dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs).Model estimates are 365 ± 66 Pg C compared to 275 (±13.5%) Pg C from GlobBiomass. The results suggest that TRENDY v6 DGVMs tend to underestimate biomass loss from anthropogenic disturbances.| | | 2020 | Uses the GlobBiomass data set of forest above-ground biomass (AGB) density for the year 2010, obtained from multiple remote sensing and in situ observations at 100 m spatial resolution to evaluate AGB estimated by nine dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs).Model estimates are 365 ± 66 Pg C compared to 275 (±13.5%) Pg C from GlobBiomass. The results suggest that TRENDY v6 DGVMs tend to underestimate biomass loss from anthropogenic disturbances.| | ||
| | https:// | | | https:// | ||
- | | | {{ : | + | | | {{ : |