This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
working_groups:equity4es:debate_of_the_month:gender_quotas [2022/01/31 15:48] nperez created |
working_groups:equity4es:debate_of_the_month:gender_quotas [2022/02/04 09:28] (current) ebergas |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | The longstanding debate on gender quotas | + | ====== Gender quotas ====== |
| + | |||
| + | Februrary, 2022 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gender quotas aim to increase the representation of women in decision-making and higher-ranked positions of public and private institutions. In gender-neutral terms: they seek a similar representation of genders. Critiques against these measures mention for instance the undermining of meritocracy and, in academia, that female workers could be overworked hampering their career progress ([[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | A recent study published in Nature Climate Change suggests that climate policy interventions can be more effective with progressive quotas that aim at 50% representation of both genders. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the case of Earth& | ||
| + | |||
| + | We have prepared a form with just 3 questions to learn from your opinion: [[https:// | ||
| + | We will report on the results in our next issue. Please, notice that all your answers will be treated anonymously. | ||
| + | |||