Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • s2dv s2dv
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 17
    • Issues 17
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 2
    • Merge requests 2
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Terraform modules
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Earth SciencesEarth Sciences
  • s2dvs2dv
  • Merge requests
  • !143

Develop GetProbs()

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Patches
  • Plain diff
Merged aho requested to merge develop-GetProbs into master Mar 28, 2023
  • Overview 2
  • Commits 4
  • Pipelines 3
  • Changes 9

Hi @cdelgado @nperez

For #93 (closed), this is a new function GetProbs() using the existing small function .get_probs() inside. .get_probs() was put in Utils() but now is renamed to .GetProbs() and moved inside GetProbs().

@cdelgado When you have time, could you review the function? I've compared to .get_probs() and the results are identical. I need your help, especially on the documentation, and if you can test with your real cases, it would be perfect. The function hasn't had dat_dim. I will add it later on. The review is not urgent, take your time!

Best,
An-Chi

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: develop-GetProbs