1. 24 Dec, 2014 2 commits
  2. 23 Dec, 2014 7 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      c4772156
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Correct test for gang scheduling config · dad7a3ac
      Morris Jette authored
      dad7a3ac
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Merge branch 'slurm-14.11' · 2cbae725
      Morris Jette authored
      2cbae725
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Prevent gang resume of suspended job · 161d0336
      Morris Jette authored
      Prevent a job manually suspended from being resumed by gang scheduler once
      free resources are available.
      bug 1335
      161d0336
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Correct ntasks_per_core test logic · 732b0d9c
      Morris Jette authored
      Now that slurm is checking that the job's ntasks_per_core is valid,
      this tests bad value was causing the job submit to fail. Change
      the option to use ntasks_per_socket instead, which matches the
      test logic.
      732b0d9c
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Merge branch 'slurm-14.11' · d87f9867
      Morris Jette authored
      d87f9867
    • Dorian Krause's avatar
      set node state RESERVED on maint reservation delete · cf846644
      Dorian Krause authored
      we have hit the following problem that seems to be present in Slurm
      slurm-14-11-2-1 and previous versions. When a node is reserved and an
      overlapping maint reservation is created and later deleted the scontrol
      output will report the node as IDLE rather than RESERVED:
      
      + scontrol show node node1
      + grep State
         State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol create reservation starttime=now duration=120 user=usr01000
      nodes=node1 ReservationName=X
      Reservation created: X
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
         State=RESERVED ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol create reservation starttime=now duration=120 user=usr01000
      nodes=ALL flags=maint,ignore_jobs ReservationName=Y
      Reservation created: Y
      + sleep 10
      + grep State
      + scontrol show nodes node1
         State=MAINT ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol delete ReservationName=Y
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
      *   State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1*
      + scontrol delete ReservationName=X
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
         State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      
      Note that the after the deletion of reservation "X" the State=IDLE
      instead of State=RESERVED. I think that the delete_resv() function in
      slurmctld/reservation.c should call set_node_maint_mode(true) like
      update_resv() does. With the patch pasted at the end of this e-mail I
      get the following output which matches my expectation:
      
      + scontrol show node node1
      + grep State
         State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol create reservation starttime=now duration=120 user=usr01000
      nodes=node1 ReservationName=X
      Reservation created: X
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
         State=RESERVED ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol create reservation starttime=now duration=120 user=usr01000
      nodes=ALL flags=maint,ignore_jobs ReservationName=Y
      Reservation created: Y
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
         State=MAINT ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      + scontrol delete ReservationName=Y
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
      *   State=RESERVED ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1*
      + scontrol delete ReservationName=X
      + sleep 10
      + scontrol show nodes node1
      + grep State
         State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1
      
      Thanks,
      Dorian
      cf846644
  3. 22 Dec, 2014 10 commits
  4. 20 Dec, 2014 8 commits
  5. 19 Dec, 2014 13 commits