1. 21 Jan, 2014 1 commit
  2. 18 Jan, 2014 1 commit
  3. 16 Jan, 2014 2 commits
  4. 15 Jan, 2014 1 commit
  5. 13 Jan, 2014 2 commits
  6. 08 Jan, 2014 3 commits
  7. 07 Jan, 2014 2 commits
  8. 06 Jan, 2014 2 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Reset job priority on manual resume · 65d9196c
      Morris Jette authored
      If a job is explicitly suspended, its priority is set to zero.
      This resets the priority when requeued and also documents that
      if the job is requeued (e.g. due to a node failure), then it
      is placed in a held state.
      65d9196c
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Correct job RunTime if requeued from suspend state · bc3d8828
      Morris Jette authored
      Without this patch, the job's RunTime includes its RunTime from
      before it's prior suspend (i.e. the job's full RunTime rather than
      just the RunTime of the requeued job).
      bc3d8828
  9. 27 Dec, 2013 1 commit
    • Filip Skalski's avatar
      Fix sched/backfill bug that could starve jobs · 2bae8bd6
      Filip Skalski authored
      Hello,
      
      I think I found another bug in the code (I'm using 2.6.3 but I checked the 2.6.5 and 14.03 versions and it's the same there).
      
      In file sched/backfill/backfill.c:
      
      1)
      _add_reservation function, from lines 1172:
      
      if (placed == true) {
              j = node_space[j].next;
              if (j && (end_reserve < node_space[j].end_time)) {
                      /* insert end entry record */
                      i = *node_space_recs;
                      node_space[i].begin_time = end_reserve;
                      node_space[i].end_time = node_space[j].end_time;
                      node_space[j].end_time = end_reserve;
                      node_space[i].avail_bitmap =
                              bit_copy(node_space[j].avail_bitmap);
                      node_space[i].next = node_space[j].next;
                      node_space[j].next = i;
                      (*node_space_recs)++;
              }
              break;
      }
      I draw a picture with `node_space` state after 2 iterations (see attachment).
      
      In case where the new reservation is fully inside another reservation,
      then everything is OK.
      But if the new reservation spans multiple existing reservations then the `end entry record` is not created.
      This is because only the newly created `start entry record` is checked.
      
      Easy fix would be to change the if into a loop, for example:
      
      if (placed == true) {
          while((j = node_space[j].next) > 0) {
              if (end_reserve < node_space[j].end_time) {
                 //same as above
                 break;
              }
          }
          break;
      }
      
      2)
      You could also change line 612:
              node_space = xmalloc(sizeof(node_space_map_t) *
                                   (max_backfill_job_cnt + 3));
      To `(max_backfill_job_cnt * 2 + 1)` , since each reservation can add at most two entries (check at line 982 should never execute). At the moment, in a worst case scenario this only checks half of the max_backfill_job_cnt.
      
      NOTE: However this is all based on the assumption, that it is not done on purpose to speed up the calculations and trading some of the accuracy (especially point 2).
      
      Best regards,
      Filip Skalski
      2bae8bd6
  10. 23 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  11. 20 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  12. 19 Dec, 2013 1 commit
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      scontrol show job - Correct NumNodes value · b31e2176
      Morris Jette authored
      It has been changed to improve the calculated value for pending
      jobs and use the actual node count value for jobs that have been
      started (including suspended, completed, etc.)
      bug 549
      b31e2176
  13. 18 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  14. 17 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  15. 16 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  16. 14 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  17. 13 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  18. 12 Dec, 2013 1 commit
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      slurmstepd variable initialization · 06b41cdc
      Morris Jette authored
      Without this patch, free() is called on a random memory location
      (i.e. whatever is on the stack), which can result in slurmstepd
      dying and a completed job not being purged in a timely fashion.
      06b41cdc
  19. 11 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  20. 09 Dec, 2013 2 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Modify squeue to support longer job ID values · 17f27007
      Morris Jette authored
      This is needed for job arrays with discontiguous task ID values
      (e.g. "123_[1,3,5,...99999]")
      17f27007
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Improve sview support for job arrays · d998640f
      Morris Jette authored
      Previously job arrays were only listed with their native job ID
      (e.g. 123_0 listed as 123, 123_1 as 124, etc). Now lists the job ID
      using both format (e.g. "123_1 (124)"). The same format is used
      for job step IDs (e.g. "123_1.2 (124.2)").
      d998640f
  21. 08 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  22. 07 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  23. 06 Dec, 2013 2 commits
  24. 05 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  25. 04 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  26. 03 Dec, 2013 1 commit