to tell the code to profile or not.

Prior to this anytime sstat was call a new entry was made in the h5 file
when profiling potentially confusing the user as to what happened.  This
removes the extra entries.

iterator.

update calls to acct_gather_energy_unpack which needs to know if it needs
to be alloced or not.

packable uint16_t

of just allocating 1.

warning right afterwards instead of after the job ran.

the fact.

HDF5 code.

sh5util if needed.

In your node_mgr fix to keep rebooted nodes down (commit 9cd15dfe), you
forgot to consider the case of nodes that are powered up but are responding after
ResumeTimeout seconds (the maximum time permitted). Such nodes are
marked DOWN (because they didn't respond within ResumeTimeout seconds) than
should become silently available when ReturnToService=1 (as stated in the slurm.conf manual)

With your modification when such nodes are finally responding, they are seen as
rebooted nodes and remain in the DOWN state (with the new reason: Node
unexpectedly rebooted) even when ReturnToService=1 !

My patch to obtain the correct behaviour:

Conflicts:
	doc/man/man5/slurm.conf.5
	src/plugins/select/cons_res/job_test.c

Equivalent fix as e1a00772
for select/serial rather than select/cons_res

1. I submit a first job that uses 1 GPU:
$ srun --gres gpu:1 --pty bash
$ echo $CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES
0

2. while the first one is still running, a 2-GPU job asking for 1 task per node
waits (and I don't really understand why):
$ srun --ntasks-per-node=1 --gres=gpu:2 --pty bash
srun: job 2390816 queued and waiting for resources

3. whereas a 2-GPU job requesting 1 core per socket (so just 1 socket) actually
gets GPUs allocated from two different sockets!
$ srun -n 1  --cores-per-socket=1 --gres=gpu:2 -p testk --pty bash
$ echo $CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES
1,2

With this change #2 works the same way as #3.
bug 1725

Bug 1572

Bug 1572

option.

Modify test to work if "." is not in search path
Fix error message, change "sbatch" to "salloc"

option.