1. 16 Jan, 2013 2 commits
  2. 15 Jan, 2013 1 commit
    • Matthieu Hautreux's avatar
      QoS limits enforcement: correct a bug with 0-valued per user used limits · 4136520d
      Matthieu Hautreux authored
      QoS limits enforcement on the controller side is based on a list of used_limits
      per user. When a user is not yet added to the list, which is common when the
      controller is restarted and the user has no running jobs, the current logic is
      to not check some of the "per user limits" and let the submission succeed.
      However, if one of these limits is a zero-valued limit, the check chould
      failed as it means that no job should be submitted at all as it would
      necessarily result in a crossing of the limit.
      
      This patch ensures that even when a user is not yet present in the per user
      used_limits list, the 0-valued limits are correctly treated.
      4136520d
  3. 14 Jan, 2013 6 commits
  4. 11 Jan, 2013 6 commits
  5. 10 Jan, 2013 7 commits
  6. 09 Jan, 2013 6 commits
  7. 08 Jan, 2013 6 commits
    • Danny Auble's avatar
      b50e2269
    • jette's avatar
    • jette's avatar
      Disable a test for select/serial plugin · 9bc0cf0b
      jette authored
      9bc0cf0b
    • Morris Jette's avatar
    • Rod Schultz's avatar
      Report node state as MAINT only if not allocated jobs · 2af5ce33
      Rod Schultz authored
      One of our testers has observed that when a long running job continues to run after a maintenance reservation comes into effect sinfo reports the node as being in the allocated state while scontrol shows it to be in the maintenance state.
      
      This can happen when a node is not completely allocated. (select cons_res, a partition which is not Shared=EXCLUSIVE, jobs allocated without –exclusive, or jobs that are allocated only some of the cpus on a node.)
      
      Execution paths leading up to calls to node_state_string  (slurm_protocol_defs.c) or node_state_string_compact, in scontrol, test for allocated_cpus less that total_cpus on the node and set the node state to MIXED rather than ALLOCATED, while similar paths in sinfo do not.
      
      I think this is probably a bug, since the mixed state is defined and think it is desirable that both command return the same result.
      
      The problem can be fixed with two logic changes (in multiple places)
      
      1)        node_state_string and node_state_string_compact have to check for mixed as well as allocated before returning the MAINT state. This means that the reported state for the node with the allocated job will be MIXED.
      
      2)        Sinfo must also check allocated_cpus less than total_cpus and set the state to MIXED before calling either node_state_string or node_state_string_compact.
      
      The attached patch (against 2.5.1) makes these changes. The attached script is a test case.
      2af5ce33
    • Morris Jette's avatar
  8. 03 Jan, 2013 6 commits