Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • autosubmit autosubmit
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 338
    • Issues 338
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 21
    • Merge requests 21
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Earth SciencesEarth Sciences
  • autosubmitautosubmit
  • Issues
  • #751
Closed
Open
Issue created Nov 08, 2021 by acarreri@acarreriDeveloper

Asking to run only a subset of members

Hi @dbeltran,

I'm using the command line of autosubmit to run only a subset of members of a seasonal forecast experiment (autosubmit run expid -rm "fc00 fc01"). But I wasn't aware that the expected behaviour was to run them in priority but then, to run the experiment normally.

I would prefer actually that autosubmit stops once all the members I asked have been run or failed. Not to keep on with the experiment, as it will run all the following members for only one startdate.

I do like to ask only members by members because my priority is to have one member run for all startdates (and not for one startdate, all the members run). It's useful when you have limited resources on a platform/project (for instance with the RES project).

I know that I could modify first the expdef file and asking first some members and changing again the expdef. But maybe it could be interesting, when using this command line, to stop the experiment once the members asked are run or failed? It probably also depends on whoelse is using this feature. I don't know if AC people are using it.

@mcastril @etourign @rfernand @jacosta

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking