Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • startR startR
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 29
    • Issues 29
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 7
    • Merge requests 7
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Earth SciencesEarth Sciences
  • startRstartR
  • Merge requests
  • !155

Improved FAQ

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Patches
  • Plain diff
Closed Nuria Pérez-Zanón requested to merge develop-FAQ-SGW4 into master Oct 22, 2021
  • Overview 4
  • Commits 2
  • Pipelines 2
  • Changes 1

Hi @aho

Given the issue @acarreri found when running her code in Nord3, I have extended a FAQ in section 'Something goes wrong'.

The problem was that the variable was being requested in return_vars:

data <- Start(..., var = 'tos', ...,
              return_vars = list(tos = NULL), 
              retrieve = FALSE)

The local run of Compute() worked fine, but, when submitting to Nord3, the job stacked showing in the following line Chunk.1.err:

Rscript load_process_save_chunk.R --args $task_path 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4
+ Rscript load_process_save_chunk.R --args /gpfs/scratch/bsc32/bsc32339/startR_hpc//STARTR_CHUNKING_5265358669///STARTR_CHUNKING_5265358669/computation/sdate_CHUNK_1/ensemble_CHUNK_1/var_CHUNK_1/dat_CHUNK_1/Chunk 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4

I have thought that the best option is to write it down in the FAQ because:

  • It is very difficult to debug the problem (there is no info in the logs and we cannot reproduce the problem in the WS) and
  • by adding 'tos' in return_vars, the data is being loaded in the attributes, so, it is not a very good practice

Could you both take a look at the new text and let me know your opinion?

Cheers,

Núria

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: develop-FAQ-SGW4