Log if the number of cores is not evenly divisible by the socket
  count (which will be the case on some KNL) or the number of
  threads is not evenly divisible by the core count.

Remove the SchedulerParameters option of "assoc_limit_continue", making it
    the default value. Add option of "assoc_limit_stop". If "assoc_limit_stop"
    is set and a job cannot start due to association limits, then do not attempt
    to initiate any lower priority jobs in that partition. Setting this can
    decrease system throughput and utlization, but avoid potentially starving
    larger jobs by preventing them from launching indefinitely.

Conflicts:
	META
	NEWS

This adds a FAQ to go with commit 8ee976b4

launching a job, instead the job will fail and drain the node if the env
isn't loaded normally.

bug 2546

Some portitions of the reservation test assume the socket/core/thread
counts are homogeneous and fail otherwise. bug 2597 added to address
root cause of failure at a later time.

Argument with 'nonnull' attribute passed null.

with the slurmdbd.

make the wait to return data only hit after 500 nodes and configurable
based on the TcpTimeout value.

There was a subtle bug in how tasks were bound to CPUs which could result
in an "infinite loop" error. The problem was various socket/core/threasd
calculations were based upon the resources allocated to a step rather than
all resources on the node and rounding errors could occur. Consider for
example a node with 2 sockets, 6 cores per socket and 2 threads per core.
On the idle node, a job requesting 14 CPUs is submitted. That job would
be allocted 4 cores on the first socket and 3 cores on the second socket.
The old logic would get the number of sockets for the job at 2 and the
number of cores at 7, then calculate the number of cores per socket at
7/2 or 3 (rounding down to an integer). The logic layouting out tasks
would bind the first 3 cores on each socket to the job then not find any
remaining cores, report the "infinite loop" error to the user, and run
the job without one of the expected cores. The problem gets even worse
when there are some allocated cores on a node. In a more extreme case,
a job might be allocated 6 cores on one socket and 1 core on a second
socket. In that case, 3 of that job's cores would be unused.
bug 2502

This is a revision to commit 1ed38f26
The root problem is that a pthread is passed an argument which is
a pointer to a variable on the stack. If that variable is over-written,
the signal number recieved will be garbage, and that bad signal
number will be interpretted by srun to possible abort the request.

This fixes tests when a cluster's node name format includes nodes
  with numeric sufficies and those without.

The previous commit obviously fixed a problem, but introduced a different
set of problems. This will be pursued later, perhaps in version 16.05.

With some configurations and systems, errors of the following sort were
occuring:
task/cgroup: task[1] infinite loop broken while trying to provision compute elements using block
task/cgroup: task[1] unable to set taskset '0x0'

Bug 1706

bug 2070

burst_buffer/cray - If the pre-run operation fails then don't issue
    duplicate job cancel/requeue unless the job is still in run state. Prevents
    jobs hung in COMPLETING state.
bug 2587

Running "scontrol reconfig" releases resources for jobs waiting for
  the completion of Node Health Check so that other jobs can run.
  Cray says to always wait for NHC to complete, but in extreme
  cases that can be 2 hours, during which the entire resource
  allocation for a job may be unusable. Per advice from NERSC,
  the logic to release resources is unchanged, but logging is
  added here.

isn't kept up to date in the cache.

as will.

Conflicts:
	src/plugins/select/cons_res/job_test.c

Fix gang scheduling resource selection bug which could prevent multiple jobs
    from being allocated the same resources. Bug was introduced in 15.08.6,
    commit 44f491b8

Also ensure empty (0-length) files are handled properly.
Remove a stray exit(1) call from _rpc_file_bcast() to avoid
slurmd exiting on malformed data.

Here's how to reproduce on smd-server with 2 sockets, 6 cores per
socket and 2 threads per core, just run the following command line
3 times in quick succession (all active at the same time):
srun --cpus-per-task=4 -m block sleep 30
What was happening is the first job would be allocated cores 0+1
The second job would be allocated cores 2+3
The thrid job would test use of cores 0-3 then exit because the
 job only needs 4 CPUs. The resulting core binding would include
 NO CPUs. The new logic tests that the core being considered for
 use actually has some resources available to the job before
 updating the counter which is being tested against the needed
 CPU counter.