- 29 Jan, 2013 7 commits
-
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Morris Jette authored
The new callbacks are not fleshed out, but eliminates a build error
-
David Bigagli authored
-
David Bigagli authored
-
Danny Auble authored
function.
-
Morris Jette authored
-
- 28 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
David Bigagli authored
-
- 26 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Danny Auble authored
-
- 23 Jan, 2013 2 commits
-
-
jette authored
I run into a problem with slurm-2.5.1 that IDLE nodes can not be allocated to jobs. This can be reproduced as follows: First, submit a job with --no-kill option (I have SLURM_EXCLUSIVE set to allocate nodes exclusively by default). Then set one of the nodes allocated to the job(cn2) to state DOWN: srun: error: Node failure on cn2 srun: error: Node failure on cn2 srun: error: cn2: task 0: Killed ^Csrun: interrupt (one more within 1 sec to abort) srun: task 1: running srun: task 0: exited abnormally ^Csrun: sending Ctrl-C to job 22605.0 srun: Job step aborted: Waiting up to 2 seconds for job step to finish. srun: Force Terminated job step 22605.0 Then change state of the node to IDLE again. But it can not be allocated to jobs: srun: job 22606 queued and waiting for resources JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 22606 work hostname root PD 0:00 1 (Resources) 22604 work sbatch root R 3:06 1 cn1 NodeName=cn2 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=8 CPUAlloc=16 CPUErr=0 CPUTot=16 CPULoad=0.05 Features=abc Gres=(null) NodeAddr=cn2 NodeHostName=cn2 OS=Linux RealMemory=30000 Sockets=2 Boards=1 State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1 BootTime=2012-12-24T15:22:34 SlurmdStartTime=2013-01-14T11:06:32 CurrentWatts=0 LowestJoules=0 ConsumedJoules=0 I traced and located the problem in select/cons_res. The call sequence is: slurmctld/node_mgr.c: update_node() => slurmctld/job_mgr.c: kill_running_job_by_node_name() => excise_node_from_job() => plugins/select/cons_res/select_cons_res.c: select_p_job_resized() => _rm_job_from_one_node() => _build_row_bitmaps() => common/job_resources: remove_job_from_cores() If there are other jobs running in the partition, the partition row bitmap will not be set correctly. In the example above, before _build_row_bitmaps(), output of _dump_part() is: [2013-01-19T13:24:56+08:00] part:work rows:1 pri:1 [2013-01-19T13:24:56+08:00] row0: num_jobs 2: bitmap: 16,32-63 after setting the node down, output of _dump_part() is [2013-01-19T13:24:56+08:00] part:work rows:1 pri:1 [2013-01-19T13:24:56+08:00] row0: num_jobs 2: bitmap: 16,32-47 Cores of cn2 are not marked as available. Instead, cores of other nodes are released. When another job requires the node cn2, the following log message appears: [2013-01-19T13:25:03+08:00] debug3: cons_res: _vns: node cn2 busy I do not understand the design of select/cons_res well and I do not know how to fix this. But it seems that _build_row_bitmaps() should not be called, since the job is not removed totally, but only one of the nodes released.
-
Morris Jette authored
-
- 22 Jan, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Magnus Jonsson authored
-
jette authored
Correction to CPU allocation logic for cores without hyperthreading Backport of https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/1ef41ac9590e018e631eaefb31254622984b7d2d
-
jette authored
-
- 19 Jan, 2013 1 commit
-
-
jette authored
-
- 18 Jan, 2013 7 commits
-
-
Morris Jette authored
From Chris Holmes, HP: After several days of brainstorming and debugging, I have identified a bug in SLURM 2.5.0rc2, related to the 'tree' topology. It was so early in the execution of the whole SLURM machinery that it took me some time to figure it out (say, 100 or 200 jobs showing the issue, with more or less debugging levels increased and extra instrumentation, with sometimes an uncertain reliability)... For every “switch” a bitmap of nodes (seen down by the switch) is built as the topology is discovered through 'topology.conf'. There is code in read_config.c, executed when the SLURM control daemon starts, that reorders the nodes (according to their hostname by default), while the switches table (ie the bitmaps) has already being built. To reorder the nodes means that the bitmaps of the switches become wrong.
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Morris Jette authored
slurm.MEM_PER_CPU, slurm.NO_VAL, etc.
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Phil Eckert authored
About a year ago I submitted a modification that you incorporated into SLURM 2.4, which was to allow an admin to modify a job to use a QOS even though the user did not have access to the QOS. However, I must have tested it without having the Accounting set to enforce QOS's. So, if an admin modifies a job to a QOS they don't have access to, it will be modified, but the job will result in a state of InvalidQOS, which is reasonable, since this would handle the case where a user has their QOS removed. A problem, however, is that even though the scheduler won't schedule the job, backfill still will. One approach would be to fix backfill to be consistent with the scheduler (which should probably occur regardless), but my thought would be to modify the scheduler to allow the QOS as long as it was set by an admin, since that was the intent of the modification to begin with. I believe it would only take a single line to change, just adding a check on the job_ptr->limit_set_qos, to make sure it was set by an admin: if (job_ptr->qos_id) { slurmdb_association_rec_t *assoc_ptr; assoc_ptr = (slurmdb_association_rec_t *)job_ptr->assoc_ptr; if (assoc_ptr && !bit_test(assoc_ptr->usage->valid_qos, job_ptr->qos_id) && !job_ptr->limit_set_qos) { info("sched: JobId=%u has invalid QOS", job_ptr->job_id); xfree(job_ptr->state_desc); job_ptr->state_reason = FAIL_QOS; continue; } else if (job_ptr->state_reason == FAIL_QOS) { xfree(job_ptr->state_desc); job_ptr->state_reason = WAIT_NO_REASON; } } Phil
-
- 17 Jan, 2013 3 commits
-
-
David Bigagli authored
-
Morris Jette authored
-
David Bigagli authored
-
- 16 Jan, 2013 14 commits
-
-
Morris Jette authored
-
David Bigagli authored
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Morris Jette authored
-
Morris Jette authored
Without this change a high priority batch job may not start at submit time. In addtion, a pending job with mutltiple partitions be cancelled when the scheduler runs if any of it's partitions can not be used by the job.
-
David Bigagli authored
-
Morris Jette authored
The original work this was based upon has been replaced with new logic.
-
Morris Jette authored
Without this patch, if the first listed partition lacks nodes with required features the job would be rejected.
-
Morris Jette authored
While this will validate job at submit time, it results in redundant looping when scheduling jobs. Working on alternate patch now.
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
submission.
-
Morris Jette authored
-
-
Morris Jette authored
-