- 06 Mar, 2018 40 commits
-
-
Danny Auble authored
and not do any conversion.
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
if nodes are given. Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
we can use jobacctinfo_aggregate instead which is much faster, dealing with arrays instead of parsing strings and then call jobacctinfo_2_stats only once. Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
This also removes tres_usage_types_t as that is no longer needed. This also adds the idea of a 'usage' tres type. Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2872
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2872
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
Bug 2872
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
to the stepd where we will use it with the different plugins to gather TRES usage.
-
Danny Auble authored
What it does here currently is sends the assoc_mgr_tres_list to the slurmd who then creates the assoc_mgr end there.
-
Danny Auble authored
to avoid freeing it on accident.
-
Danny Auble authored
messages other than just rc messages.
-
Danny Auble authored
It isn't used quite yet, but will be in the next commit!
-
Danny Auble authored
-
Danny Auble authored
code copied from slurmdbd_defs.c so we can use it elsewhere.
-
Danny Auble authored
This way we can put more on here as startup was only a bool anyway.
-
Danny Auble authored
in the form of assoc_mgr_post_tres_list
-
Bill Brophy authored
Bug 2872
-
Bill Brophy authored
Not sure if this could be done a different way. At the moment I wouldn't mind making a common structure to get the read and writes. Or perhaps make use of a different array or such. In the end this might be the best way to do it, but it isn't clear at the moment since the num_* isn't sent to the database in any fashion. Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
This will most likely be reverted as well since we plan on moving the Usage TRES to dynamic. Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
Not sure if this could be done a different way. At the moment I wouldn't mind making a filesystem specific structure to pass in. Or perhaps make use of a different array or such. In the end this might be the best way to do it, but it isn't clear at the moment since the num_* isn't sent to the database in any fashion. Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
This will most likely be reverted as well since we plan on moving the Usage TRES to dynamic. Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
At the moment I am wondering if this is needed or not. Perhaps we might want to revert this. Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
Bug 2782
-
Bill Brophy authored
Bug 2782
-
Danny Auble authored
-