when one offset passes and other fails.

Bug 6892

Bug 6513.

Bug 6513

Bug 6513

First offset is good but second is bad -- didn't request task count.

$ cat etc/job_submit.lua
function slurm_job_submit(job_desc, part_list, submit_uid)
        slurm.log_user("submit1\nstuff")
        slurm.log_user("submit2")
        slurm.log_user("submit3")

    -- slurm.log_user("case 0")
    if job_desc.num_tasks == slurm.NO_VAL or job_desc.num_tasks == nil then
        slurm.log_user("Batch submit error:  Must specify either number of nodes or number of tasks!")
        -- reject the job
        return slurm.ERROR
    end

        return slurm.SUCCESS
end

function slurm_job_modify(job_desc, job_rec, part_list, modify_uid)
        slurm.log_user("modify1")
        slurm.log_user("modify2")
        slurm.log_user("modify3")
        return slurm.SUCCESS
end

slurm.log_user("initialized")
return slurm.SUCCESS

$ sbatch -Ablah2 -n1 --wrap="hostname" : -J asdfl
sbatch: error: 0: initialized
sbatch: error: 0: submit1
sbatch: error: 0: stuff
sbatch: error: 0: submit2
sbatch: error: 0: submit3
sbatch: error: submit1
sbatch: error: stuff
sbatch: error: submit2
sbatch: error: submit3
sbatch: error: Batch submit error:  Must specify either number of nodes or number of tasks!
sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Unspecified error

$ sbatch -Ablah2 -n1 --wrap="hostname" : -J asdfl
sbatch: error: 0: initialized
sbatch: error: 0: submit1
sbatch: error: 0: stuff
sbatch: error: 0: submit2
sbatch: error: 0: submit3
sbatch: error: 1: submit1
sbatch: error: 1: stuff
sbatch: error: 1: submit2
sbatch: error: 1: submit3
sbatch: error: 1: Batch submit error:  Must specify either number of nodes or number of tasks!
sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Unspecified error

srun already handles this

Was dumping this:
$ srun -A test7.21-account.1 --qos test7.21-qos.1 -n5 : -n3 : -n1 /bin/true
srun: error: 0: submit1
srun: error: submit2
srun: error: submit3
srun: error: Unable to allocate resources: Invalid account or account/partition combination specified

Will now dump this:
$ srun -A test7.21-account.1 --qos test7.21-qos.1 -n5 : -n3 : -n1 /bin/true
srun: error: 0: initialized
srun: error: 0: submit1
srun: error: 0: submit2
srun: error: 0: submit3
srun: error: Unable to allocate resources: Invalid account or account/partition combination specified

Bug 6513.

Regression from 70b4e06d.

Bug 6892.

Bug 6895.

Bug 6895

Bug 6895

Bug 6215

Change references to the "micro" release in rpc.html and troubleshoot.html
as well; SchedMD refers to the last part of the version number as the
"maintenance" release.

Bug 6833.

Bug 6832.

Bug 6832.

Bug 6832.

No functional change.

Bug 6832.

Otherwise, we could send communication packets bigger than max_allowed_packet.

Bug 6832.

Co-authored-by: Tim Wickberg <tim@schedmd.com>

Regression introduced in 8d643e79.

Bug 6832.

The problem was freeing an interior pointer to buffer contents before
the call to FREE_NULL_BUFFER. The issue was only triggered when loading
an archived data with protocol version < 17.11.

Regression introduced in 8d643e79.

Bug 6832.

when not the head job.

Bug 6837

For more in depth explanation see comment 24

Bug 6873

When specifying -j and not -s then non-eligible jobs will be shown
by sacct.
Time windows can also be used with -S and -E.
If --state is also used then non-eligible jobs won't be shown,
because non-eligible are not actually PD.

Bug 6873

# Conflicts:
#	NEWS

Bug 6805

Bug 6898

Continuation of commit cc153e03

Cancelled jobs before start have time_start=0 in the DB, but their
time_end!=0 (the cancel time).
Query fixed to handle properly these cases for -s PD.

Bug 6894

Bug 6878

Test was always leaving around a file named "slurm.conf.orig".
Now delete the file on test success.

bug 6878

Bug 6878

Brought the option in line with the "numtasks" option you use when
not specifying --step. Preserved backwards compatbility for "numtask"
for steps. Also upated docs and expect test.

Bug 6861

Properly initialize structures throughout Slurm.

Bug 6613

Bug 6613

Bug 6613

Regression from aca37654

.

Bug 6826.

Co-authored-by: Chad Vizino <chad@schedmd.com>

Wrong variable was used.  This works fine for 18.08, but in 19.05 this
code doesn't work correctly.

Bug 6739

Bug 6865

Bug 6313

Bug 6625.