1. 28 Mar, 2016 2 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      task/cgroup - Fix task binding to CPUs bug · ddf6d9a4
      Morris Jette authored
      There was a subtle bug in how tasks were bound to CPUs which could result
      in an "infinite loop" error. The problem was various socket/core/threasd
      calculations were based upon the resources allocated to a step rather than
      all resources on the node and rounding errors could occur. Consider for
      example a node with 2 sockets, 6 cores per socket and 2 threads per core.
      On the idle node, a job requesting 14 CPUs is submitted. That job would
      be allocted 4 cores on the first socket and 3 cores on the second socket.
      The old logic would get the number of sockets for the job at 2 and the
      number of cores at 7, then calculate the number of cores per socket at
      7/2 or 3 (rounding down to an integer). The logic layouting out tasks
      would bind the first 3 cores on each socket to the job then not find any
      remaining cores, report the "infinite loop" error to the user, and run
      the job without one of the expected cores. The problem gets even worse
      when there are some allocated cores on a node. In a more extreme case,
      a job might be allocated 6 cores on one socket and 1 core on a second
      socket. In that case, 3 of that job's cores would be unused.
      bug 2502
      ddf6d9a4
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Fix for srun signal handling threading problem · c8d36dba
      Morris Jette authored
      This is a revision to commit 1ed38f26
      The root problem is that a pthread is passed an argument which is
      a pointer to a variable on the stack. If that variable is over-written,
      the signal number recieved will be garbage, and that bad signal
      number will be interpretted by srun to possible abort the request.
      c8d36dba
  2. 26 Mar, 2016 1 commit
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Revert commit efa83a02 · c1dde86c
      Morris Jette authored
      The previous commit obviously fixed a problem, but introduced a different
      set of problems. This will be pursued later, perhaps in version 16.05.
      c1dde86c
  3. 25 Mar, 2016 2 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Revert commit 6c14b969 · f5920b77
      Morris Jette authored
      With some configurations and systems, errors of the following sort were
      occuring:
      task/cgroup: task[1] infinite loop broken while trying to provision compute elements using block
      task/cgroup: task[1] unable to set taskset '0x0'
      f5920b77
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      burst_buffer/cray - pre-run fail fix · 5a48207e
      Morris Jette authored
      burst_buffer/cray - If the pre-run operation fails then don't issue
          duplicate job cancel/requeue unless the job is still in run state. Prevents
          jobs hung in COMPLETING state.
      bug 2587
      5a48207e
  4. 24 Mar, 2016 4 commits
  5. 23 Mar, 2016 4 commits
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      gang scheduling bug fix · 5f1e78f6
      Morris Jette authored
      Fix gang scheduling resource selection bug which could prevent multiple jobs
          from being allocated the same resources. Bug was introduced in 15.08.6,
          commit 44f491b8
      5f1e78f6
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      task/cgroup: Fix for task binding anomaly · efa83a02
      Morris Jette authored
      Here's how to reproduce on smd-server with 2 sockets, 6 cores per
      socket and 2 threads per core, just run the following command line
      3 times in quick succession (all active at the same time):
      srun --cpus-per-task=4 -m block sleep 30
      What was happening is the first job would be allocated cores 0+1
      The second job would be allocated cores 2+3
      The thrid job would test use of cores 0-3 then exit because the
       job only needs 4 CPUs. The resulting core binding would include
       NO CPUs. The new logic tests that the core being considered for
       use actually has some resources available to the job before
       updating the counter which is being tested against the needed
       CPU counter.
      efa83a02
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      task/cgroup: Fix for task layout logic when disabled resources. · 6c14b969
      Morris Jette authored
      Specifically add the HWLOC_TOPOLOGY_FLAG_WHOLE_SYSTEM flag when
      loading configuration from HWLOC library. Previous logic in
      task/cgroup did not do this, which was different behaviour from
      how slurmd gets configuration information. Here's the HWLOC
      documentation:
      HWLOC_TOPOLOGY_FLAG_WHOLE_SYSTEM
      Detect the whole system, ignore reservations and offline settings.
      Gather all resources, even if some were disabled by the administrator.
      For instance, ignore Linux Cpusets and gather all processors and memory
      nodes, and ignore the fact that some resources may be offline.
      
      Without this flag, I was rarely observing a bad core count, which
      resulted in the logic layout out tasks wrong and generating an error:
      task/cgroup: task[0] infinite loop broken while trying to provision compute elements using cyclic
      
      bug 2502
      6c14b969
    • Danny Auble's avatar
  6. 22 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  7. 21 Mar, 2016 3 commits
  8. 18 Mar, 2016 2 commits
    • Tim Wickberg's avatar
      Fix typo. · 886df85b
      Tim Wickberg authored
      886df85b
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      Fix for srun abort on SIGSTOP+SIGCONT · 1ed38f26
      Morris Jette authored
      Avoid possibly aborting srun that gets simultaneous SIGSTOP+SIGCONT while
          creating the job step. The result is that the signal hanlder gets a
          argument (the signal received) of zero.
      
      Here's a log, window 1:
      $ srun hostname
      srun: Job step creation temporarily disabled, retrying
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 18
      srun: I Got signal 0
      srun: Cancelled pending job step
      
      Window 2:
      $  kill -STOP 18696 ; kill -CONT 18696
      $  kill -STOP 18696 ; kill -CONT 18696
      $  kill -STOP 18696 ; kill -CONT 18696
      ....
      
      bug 2494
      1ed38f26
  9. 17 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  10. 16 Mar, 2016 6 commits
  11. 15 Mar, 2016 5 commits
  12. 14 Mar, 2016 3 commits
  13. 11 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  14. 10 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  15. 09 Mar, 2016 1 commit
    • Morris Jette's avatar
      cray job requeue bug · fec5e03b
      Morris Jette authored
      Fix Cray NHC spawning on job requeue. Previous logic would leave nodes
      allocated to a requeued job as non-usable on job termination.
      
      Specifically, each job has a "cleaning/cleaned" flag. Once a job
      terminates, the cleaning flag is set, then after the job node health
      check completes, the value gets set to cleaned. If the job is requeued,
      on its second (or subsequent) termination, the select/cray plugin
      is called to launch the NHC. The plugin sees the "cleaned" flag
      already set, it then logs:
      error: select_p_job_fini: Cleaned flag already set for job 1283858, this should never happen
      and returns, never launching the NHC. Since the termination of the
      job NHC triggers releasing job resources (CPUs, memory, and GRES),
      those resources are never released for use by other jobs.
      
      Bug 2384
      fec5e03b